论文部分内容阅读
为了验证《中国学术期刊(光盘版)》电子杂志社提出的新型期刊评价指标——期刊影响力指数(Journal Clout Index,CI)的科学性,首先采用JCR数据分析影响因子(IF)与5年影响因子(IF5)、IF与即年指标(IM)、IF与总被引频次(TC)之间的相关性,得出结论:IF、IF5、IM是相关性显著的同类指标,IF与TC的相关性较弱;因而认为,TC和IF是可用来评价期刊影响力的主要指标,基于这2个指标的综合评价指标——期刊影响力指数(CI)具有合理性。进一步实证分析了CI这一综合指标对国际期刊的排序结果比采用单一指标——影响因子(IF)排序更符合实际经验认识。
In order to verify the scientificness of Journal Clout Index (CI), a new evaluation index of journals proposed by China Academic Journals (CD) magazine, JCR data was used to analyze the relationship between IF and five years (IF5), IF, IM, IF and TC, concluded that IF, IF5 and IM are the same indicators with significant correlation, IF and TC Therefore, TC and IF are the main indicators that can be used to evaluate the influence of journals. Based on these two indicators, the comprehensive evaluation index - Journal Impact Index (CI) is reasonable. Further empirical analysis of the CI of the comprehensive index of international journals sort results than using a single indicator - influence factor (IF) ranking more in line with the practical experience.