论文部分内容阅读
旧石器考古学研究发展迅速,研究重心也在发生转移,但石器研究作为基础研究仍需要加强。石器研究中,类型学的研究又是一项长期而艰难的工作,其中石器的分类和命名长期以来一直是人们关注但仍未妥善解决的问题。石器分类和命名中各自为政的情形急需改善,本文针对这些问题参与一点讨论,对石器分类应该以最大限度获取石器能够反映的各种信息,采用以不同研究目的运用不同分类方法的灵活分类原则,而对石器命名则应该尽量规范统一,为深入研究和比较分析做好铺垫,使石器研究冲破时间、地域的限制,摆脱个人因素干扰,趋于客观。
Palaeolithic archeology has developed rapidly, research center of gravity is also shifting, but stone research as a basic research still needs to be strengthened. In stone research, the study of typology is another long-term and difficult task. The classification and naming of stone tools have long been a problem that people are concerned about but have not yet properly solved. In this paper, some discussions on these issues are involved. For the classification of stone tools, various information that can be reflected in the stone tools should be obtained to the maximum extent. The principle of flexible classification using different classification methods for different research purposes should be adopted. The naming of stone tools should be standardized as much as possible to pave the way for further research and comparative analysis so that stone research breaks through time and geographical constraints and gets rid of the interference of personal factors and tends to be objective.