论文部分内容阅读
一、两种意见:赞成或反对对语言技能的分类与这问题有关的文献有两大类。第一类文献讨论的问题比较一般,即把语言能力分为诸如读、写、听、说这几种技能有无意义;第二类文献讨论的问题则比较具体,即听力理解是否是可分离出来的因子。下面我们就对这两个问题——一般问题和具体问题——提供赞成论据和反对论据的文献,作一番回顾。在语言教学文献的术语中,那个一般问题,即把语言能力分为若干独立技能有无意义的问题,通常被称为“统一能力而非可分能力之说”(UCH)或称为“整体语言能力而非单个技能”(GLP)之辩。下面我们首先回顾的是赞成UCH/GLP假说的意见,即:语言能力就其意义不能分为若干单独技能。 1.赞成UCH/GLP的意见
One or two comments: yes or no Approaches to the classification of language skills There are two broad categories of literature on this issue. The problems discussed in the first category of literature are more general, that is, whether it is meaningful to classify language ability into skills such as reading, writing, listening and speaking. The second type of literature discusses more specific issues, namely, whether or not hearing comprehension is separable Out of the factor. Let us recall some of the literature that provided both arguments and objections to these two issues, general issues and specific issues. Among the terminology used in language teaching literature, the general question, the question of whether meaning is divided into several independent skills, is often referred to as “UCH” or “whole” Language ability rather than a single skill "(GLP) debate. Let us first recall the opinion in favor of the UCH / GLP hypothesis that linguistic competence can not be divided into several separate meanings. 1. In favor of UCH / GLP’s opinion