论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨高压氧辅助治疗脑外伤患者的临床疗效观察。方法:筛选2014年1月至2016年1月开县人民医院收治的颅脑外伤患者84例。所有患者均明确致伤因素,采根据患者是否接受高压氧治疗将其分为对照组与观察组,其中对照组40例患者仅接受脑外伤临床常规治疗,观察组44例患者则在常规治疗基础上采用高压氧治疗,比较两组患者治疗效果,并采用格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)以及重症颅脑外伤残疾评分(DRS)评估两组患者治疗前后症状改善情况。结果:观察组患者治疗总有效率明显高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);两组患者治疗前GCS、DRS评分比较差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗后两组患者GCS、DRS均明显改善,但观察组患者改善效果更为显著,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:高压氧辅助治疗脑外伤患者可有效提升其临床治疗有效率,并且可有效改善患者脑水肿、颅内高压症状,降低继发性脑组织损伤发生。
Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on traumatic brain injury. Methods: From January 2014 to January 2016, 84 cases of craniocerebral injury patients were treated in Kaixian People’s Hospital. All patients were clearly the cause of injury, according to whether patients undergoing hyperbaric oxygen therapy will be divided into control group and observation group, of which 40 patients in the control group received only conventional treatment of traumatic brain injury, the observation group of 44 patients in the conventional treatment basis The hyperbaric oxygen therapy was used to compare the therapeutic effects of the two groups. The Glasgow coma scale (GCS) and the severe craniocerebral trauma disability score (DRS) were used to evaluate the improvement of symptoms before and after treatment. Results: The total effective rate of observation group was significantly higher than that of control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in the scores of GCS and DRS before treatment (P> 0.05) The GCS and DRS of both groups were significantly improved, but the improvement effect of the observation group was more significant, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: Hyperbaric oxygen adjuvant treatment of traumatic brain injury patients can effectively improve the efficiency of clinical treatment, and can effectively improve patients with cerebral edema, symptoms of intracranial hypertension and reduce the occurrence of secondary brain injury.