论文部分内容阅读
孔子“笔削《春秋》义法”是两千年《春秋》研究的核心问题，一直扑朔迷离，奥妙莫测。自汉代董仲舒“公羊学”盛兴，标榜孔圣人作“经”，从中生发无数穿凿附会，矛盾百出的“微言大义”，从此将《春秋》研究引入误区。考先秦至汉初典籍，凡称名皆“孔子作《春秋》”，而所征引《春秋》皆出自《左传》。《左传》乃左丘明“因孔子史记具论其语” (司马迁《史记·十二诸侯年表序》 )而成，它与左丘明所撰《国语》思想倾向、语言风格皆截然不同。显然，《左传》主体即“孔子史记”，也就是孔子所“笔削”的《春秋》。“《春秋》笔削义法”存在于《左传》之中 (而不存于“经”中 )，笔者不揣浅陋，抛砖引玉，希望把“春秋学”引出千年误区。
Confucius “pen-cut” Spring and Autumn “Justice” is the core issue of the study of “Spring and Autumn” in the past two thousand years, which has always been very complicated and unpredictable. Since the Han dynasty Dong Zhongshu “ram science” Shengxing, advertised Kong Shengren as “Jing”, from which numerous hair drills attached, contradictory “micro-righteousness”, from the “Spring and Autumn” study into the erroneous zone. Test from the Qin to Han dynasties classics, where are known as “Confucius as” Spring and Autumn “”, and cited the “Spring and Autumn” are from “Zuo Zhuan.” “Zuo Zhuan” is left Qiu Ming “because of the history of Confucius records with its own language” (Sima Qian “Historical Records twelve princes chronology”) is made, it and Zuo Qiuming’s “Mandarin” ideological tendencies, language style are clear different. Obviously, the main body of “Zuo Zhuan” is “Historical Records of Confucius”, that is, “Spring and Autumn” by Confucius. “Spring and Autumn” Pencil of Rites and Rites “exists in the” Zuo Zhuan “(but not in the” Book of Songs “), the author does not humble shallow, patronage, hope” Spring and Autumn Annals "lead thousands of years of misunderstanding.