论文部分内容阅读
目的 探讨心理护理干预在消化内镜检查患者中的应用方法及效果.方法 选择2019年6月～2020年10月规划为样本收集时区,并以该时区内就本院行消化内镜检查的113例患者作为本次研究样本对象.基于电脑病历随机抽取规则(单双号),分为对照组和观察组.对照组(56例)予以常规护理干预;观察组(57例)实施常规护理联合心理干预.分析比对两组对象干预前后的焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分情况、生活质量评分、心理舒适度以及护理满意度情况.结果 干预前,两组对象SAS及SDS评分对比无明显区别(P＞0.05);干预后,观察组两项评分35.15±4.26分;38.45±3.65分均明显低于对照组的51.53±5.48分、50.26±3.54分,两项比对结果均差异显著(t/P:17.757/＜0.001;17.456/＜0.001);观察组生活质量评分93.59±6.83分,各项心理舒适度评分17.45±2.21分、34.24±4.67分、24.54±3.17分、31.34±3.67分及总分103.35±14.32分均显著高于对照组的66.27±6.32分、13.34±2.09分、30.45±5.02分、18.54±3.32分、26.71±3.11分、85.67±13.05分,各项比对结果均差异显著(t/P:-22.060/＜0.001;-10.154/＜0.001;-4.156/＜0.001;-9.827/＜0.001;-7.229/＜0.001;-6.856/＜0.001);且该组护理满意度(96.49％)显著高于对照组(80.36％),比对结果差异显著(x2/P:7.222/0.007).结论 在消化内镜检查中应用心理护理干预措施能有效改善患者焦虑、抑郁等不良情绪,提高其生活质量、心理舒适度和患者满意度,有效改善护理效果,具有较高的临床应用和价值.“,”Objective To explore the application methods and effects of psychological nursing intervention in patients undergoing digestive endoscopy. Methods The period from June 2019 to October 2020 was selected as the sample collection time zone, and 113 patients who underwent digestive endoscopy in our hospital in this time zone were selected as the sample objects for this study. Based on the rules of random extraction of computer medical records (single and even numbers), they are divided into control group and observation group. The control group (56 cases) received conventional nursing intervention; the observation group (57 cases) received conventional nursing combined with psychological intervention. To analyze and compare the scores of self-rating anxiety scale (SAS), self-rating depression scale (SDS), quality of life scores, psychological comfort and nursing satisfaction of the two groups before and after intervention. Results Before the intervention, there was no significant difference in SAS and SDS scores between the two groups (P＜0.05); after the intervention, the two scores 35.15±4.26; 38.45±3.65 of the observation group were significantly lower than those of the control group 51.53±5.48; 50.26±3.54 the results of the two comparisons were significantly different (t/P: 17.757/＜0.001; 17.456/＜0.001); the quality of life score of the observation group 93.59±6.83 and the various psychological comfort scores 17.45± 2.21; 34.24±4.67; 24.54±3.17; 31.34±3.67 and the total score 103.35±14.32 were significantly higher than the control group 66.27±6.32; 13.34±2.09; 30.45±5.02; 18.54±3.32; 26.71±3.11; 85.67 ±13.05, all comparison results are significantly different (t/P: -22.060/＜0.001; -10.154/＜0.001; -4.156/＜0.001; -9.827/＜0.001; -7.229/＜0.001; -6.856 /＜0.001); and the nursing satisfaction of this group (96.49％) was significantly higher than that of the control group (80.36％), and the comparison results were significantly different (x2/P: 7.222/0.007). Conclusion The application of psychological nursing interventions in digestive endoscopy can effectively improve patients\'\' unhealthy emotions such as tension and anxiety, improve their quality of life, psychological comfort, and patient satisfaction, and effectively improve nursing outcomes. It has high clinical application and value.