论文部分内容阅读
通过双主裁判实验、临场观察统计与对比分析,研究结果表明：双裁直线法跑动区域的划分平等合理、职责分工明确,易于操作；与单裁制相比,增大了观察范围与角度,减少了中场往返的奔跑,选位合理,到位及时,节省体力,同时监控有球区和无球区,在关键位置、关键球出现判罚争议时能相互弥补漏洞,有利于控制突发事件,降低主观因素对判罚结果的影响,对于控制比赛双方的攻防快速转换和进攻的快速转移局面更加有利。从制度上解决单裁制裁判“盲区”隐蔽性犯规漏判问题,比较适合大学生联赛,尤其在培养年轻裁判员时值得借鉴。建议在高校足球联赛中推广,并在青少年业余足球比赛中进一步研究。
Through the double chief referee experiment, spot observation statistics and comparative analysis, the research results show that the division of running area in the double-punishment and straight-line method is fair and reasonable, the division of responsibilities is clear and easy to operate; Compared with the single-awarding system, the observation scope and angle are enlarged , Reducing the midfield round-trip run, the location is reasonable, in place in time to save energy, while monitoring the zone and the ball-free zone, in the key position, the key ball penalty disputes can make up for each other loopholes in control of emergencies , Reducing the impact of subjective factors on the outcome of the penalty for the control of both the offensive and defensive game rapid transfer and offensive rapid transfer situation more favorable. From the system to solve the problem of omission of concealed fouls in the “blind spot” of the sole arbitration referee, it is more suitable for college leagues, especially when training young referees. Proposed to promote in the college football league, and in the young amateur football game further study.