论文部分内容阅读
分析陈述与综合陈述的区分究竟是否可能，是卡尔纳普与奎因论战的中心问题。瑞士当代分析哲学家劳纳从语言一元化的立场出发独树一帜地提出了奎卡之争的解决方案，其核心内容即是“语境”以及对“误境”的相对主义和实在化处理。这一方案克服了卡尔纳普对分析与综合陈述的绝然划分引起的经验主义教条问题；同时也克服了奎因的整体主义所引起的新形而上学问题。这反映了当今欧洲大陆分析哲学不同于英美同行的传统哲学的特点。
It is the central issue of the debate between Carnap and Quine to analyze whether the distinction between statements and comprehensive statements is possible. The Swiss contemporary analytic philosopher Lauren, from the standpoint of language unification, proposed a unique solution to the quarrel dispute. Its core content is “context” and its relativism and realism. This plan overcame Carnap’s empiricism dogma caused by the unmistakable division of analysis and synthesis, and overcame New Metaphysics caused by Quinn’s monolithism. This reflects the characteristic of the traditional philosophy that contemporary European continent analytic philosophy is different from that of British and American counterparts.