论文部分内容阅读
诗性智慧一词本是维柯用来指称在人类天性中最为深层的精神活动方式。劳承万运用美学方法对这个概念进行现代阐释。从研究方法上说，维柯偏重于民族学，而劳氏则倾向于美学。前者意在探索人类智慧的真正起源；而后者则旨在寻求解答“外部刺激力向意识事实转化”的实证之路。从价值观角度，维柯更偏重于历史学，意在以所谓的异教历史进行反神学的斗争；而劳氏则更倾向于语言学，旨在探索符号（语言学）与情感运动（诗学）的共同本源，以解开语言、诗、思以及人的审美活动的秘密。诗性智慧是在认识论与本体论之间最重要的桥梁。所以这一研究仍可看作是“审美中介学”向人类学领域的有力拓展。
The term poetic wisdom is what Vico uses to refer to the deepest mental activity in human nature. Laochenwan uses aesthetics to modernize this concept. In terms of research methods, Vico focuses on ethnology, while Lloyd’s tends to aesthetics. The former aims to explore the true origins of human wisdom, while the latter aims to find a positive way to answer the question “Transformation of external stimuli into consciousness facts”. From a value point of view, Vico more emphasis on history, intended to fight the so-called pagan history anti-theology; and Loew is more inclined to linguistics, to explore symbols (linguistics) and emotional movement (poetics ) In order to solve the secrets of language, poetry, thought and human aesthetic activities. Poetic wisdom is the most important bridge between epistemology and ontology. Therefore, this research can still be regarded as a powerful expansion of “aesthetic mediation” to the field of anthropology.