论文部分内容阅读
眼下体育界盛行一个单位挂两块牌子:一个是事业法人的牌子,另一个是社团法人的牌子。据说这种合属办公的效果不错,少了扯皮多了效率,满有中国特色。然而这种组织结构带有明显的过渡性,且造成了组织功能的错置和组织权能的惰性,而其滋生的特异权能往往造成诸多体育的异化现象。既然是两块牌子就必然功能各异:事业性牌子有着特殊的隶属关系和行政管理的某些成份;社团的牌子则更多带有社会性、行业性和专业性共同体的色彩。他们的目标、运作方式和管理模式都有极大的差异。在一个领域或同一个行业,事业单位和社团有着不同层次的任务,不同的职能和责任,把二者混同于一是不正确的,否定二者之间的分工协作也是谬误。把两个功能各异的牌子套在一个单位头上,这体
Now popular in the sports world linked to two units of a unit: one is a corporate brand, the other is a corporate corporate brand. It is said that this kind of affiliate office has a good result, less wrangling more efficiency, full of Chinese characteristics. However, this organizational structure with a clear transitional and organizational functions caused by the misplacement and organizational inertia, and its breeding special powers often cause a lot of sports alienation. Since they are two brands, they inevitably have different functions: they have certain affiliations and certain elements of administrative management; and their brands have more of a social, industrial and professional community. Their goals, mode of operation and management are very different. In one area or in the same industry, institutions and associations have different levels of tasks, different functions and responsibilities. It is incorrect to confuse the two with one. It is a fallacy to deny the division of labor between the two. Put two different brands of brands in a unit head, this body