论文部分内容阅读
目的 :通过与HumphreyHFAⅡ相比较 ,验证TopconSBP 3 0 0 0型视野计是否达到了一定的临床有效性。方法 :对年龄在 11～ 70岁的 3 0例患者 56只受检眼进行 2 4 2的全阈值模式测量对比研究 ,及对视野几项指标进行统计学处理。结果 :平均缺损 (MD)指数与模式标准差 (PSD)指数经秩和检验无显著性差异 ;两种视野计的模式偏差概率图的鼻上、颞上、鼻下、颞下四个象限分别两两比较无显著性差异。结论 :Topcon视野计在临床应用中基本达到了诊断价值已被承认的HumphreyHFAⅡ的诊断水平
OBJECTIVE: To verify whether TopconSBP 3000 visual field has achieved a certain clinical validity by comparing with Humphrey HFA II. Methods: A total of 242 full-threshold models of 56 examined eyes of 30 patients 11 to 70 years of age were selected and compared. Several indicators of visual field were statistically analyzed. Results: The average defect (MD) index and pattern standard deviation (PSD) index had no significant difference by rank sum test. The quadrant of nasal, superior temporal, nasal and inferior temporal pattern No significant difference between each other. Conclusion: The clinical application of Topcon fluorometer has basically reached the diagnostic level of Humphrey HFAⅡ