论文部分内容阅读
通过收费缓解交通拥堵的政治可行性取决于谁获得通行费收入。指出如果收益被分配给城市,特别是高速公路经过的城市,拥挤收费取得政治成功的可能性最大。与已有的很多建议不同,指出城市是比个体驾驶人和区域政府更有力的收益申索人。基于行为经济学和政治科学理论并结合几个大都市区的数据,对提议进行解析和阐述。在洛杉矶,潜在的拥挤收费收入估计每年接近50亿美元,将这些收入分配至高速公路经过的城市对拥挤收费的实施是有政治影响力和促进作用的。
The political viability of charging congestion to ease traffic congestion depends on who receives toll revenue. Pointed out that if income is allocated to cities, especially cities passing by highways, congestion charges are most likely to achieve political success. Unlike many of the existing proposals, the city is arguably a stronger payer than individual drivers and regional governments. Based on behavioral economics and political science theory and combining data from several metropolitan areas, the proposal is analyzed and elaborated. In Los Angeles, potential congestion charges are estimated at nearly $ 5 billion a year, and the allocation of these revenues to the cities through which the freeways pass can have a political impact and contribution to the implementation of congestion charges.