论文部分内容阅读
一看这个题目《本是同根生,相辅促共荣》,也许有的朋友会说,新诗是舶来品,怎么能说和祖传下来的古体诗是同根生呢?我想早在2500年前,春秋时期齐国大夫晏子出使楚国时候就说过这样的一段名言:“婴闻之,橘生淮南则为橘,生于淮北则为枳。叶徒相似,其实味不同。所以然者何?水土异也。”就是一条淮河之隔的南北水土差异,橘和枳的果实味道就截然不同。那么作为国外舶来品的新诗,被引进生长在中国这个五千年血脉不断、人种没换的民族文化水土中,它的根须当然要吸收以中华诗词为精华的中华文化水土的营养,更何况写新诗的人,也是传承着唐诗宋词文化血脉的中国人。难道能说新诗和古体诗的诗人群体不是同根共祖的中国人吗?难道能说新诗和古体诗不是同样根植在中华民族文化的土壤里吗?
A look at this topic, “This is the same root, complementarity and common prosperity,” and some friends may say that the new poem is exotic, how can we say that ancient poetry ancestral down with the same root? I think as early as 2500 years ago, Spring and Autumn During the period when Qi Yan, an eminent doctor of Qi State, came to Chu this time, he said something like this: “The baby smells oranges and produces oranges in Huainan, while in Huaibei it is trifoliate oranges. Different soil and water. ”Is a difference between North and South water and soil across the Huaihe River, Orange and Trifoliate fruit taste very different. Then as a new poem imported from abroad, was introduced to grow in China this five thousand years of continuous blood, human race did not change the national culture of soil and water, of course, its roots must absorb Chinese poetry as the essence of Chinese culture and soil nutrition, not to mention Those who write new poems are also Chinese who inherit the blood of the Tang poetry and Song poetry. Can we say that the poet groups of new poems and ancient poems are not Chinese with the same root ancestors? Can we say that new poems and ancient poems are not equally rooted in the soil of Chinese culture?