论文部分内容阅读
这里的四篇论文内容不同,却有一个不很明显的共同主题,也就是讨论“东亚”与“中国”。我们很难把这些论文简单地归为“政治史”、“史学史”或者“观念史”的传统学科范畴中。表面上看来,葛兆光讨论一国史和东亚史的差异,大致可以算史学史或者史学方法,但是他想说明的却是,很多历史事件犹如草蛇灰线,东山钟鸣,西山磬应,虽然表面只涉及某一两个国家,实际上却会对整个东亚区域都有影响,如果忽略这些“外面”的或者
There are four different essays here, but one of the less common themes is “East Asia” and “China”. It is difficult for us to categorize these papers simply into the traditional disciplinary categories of “political history”, “history of history” or “history of ideas”. On the face of it, Ge Zhaoguang’s discussion of the differences between the history of one country and that of East Asia can be regarded as a historical or historical method. However, what he wants to illustrate is that many historical events are like gray lines, Only involves one or two countries, in fact, it will have an impact on the entire East Asian region. If you ignore these “outsides” or