论文部分内容阅读
最近,内蒙古包头天伦环保产业公司(以下简称天伦公司)接连向本刊投诉,反映在自己与内蒙古青乌安装公司(化名,以下简称青乌公司)的建筑施工合同纠纷一案中,个别司法机关偏听偏信,使天伦公司的合法权益受到严重侵犯,好端端的环保企业破产倒闭。在该案中,包头市人民检察院(以下简称包头检察院)对此案曾提出抗诉,最高人民法院(以下简称最高院)两次裁定发回重审,但依然没有正本清源。如今,漫长的10年过去了,天伦公司依然艰难地走在维权之路上。
Recently, Inner Mongolia Baotou Tianlun Environmental Protection Industry Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Tianlun Company) lodged a complaint to this magazine, which was reflected in the dispute over the construction contract between itself and Inner Mongolia Qingwu Installation Co. (a pseudonym, hereinafter referred to as Qingwu Company). Individual judicial organs Partial hearing bias, so that the legitimate rights and interests of Tianlun company was a serious violation, a good end of the environmental bankruptcy. In this case, Baotou People’s Procuratorate (hereinafter referred to as Baotou Procuratorate) filed a protest against the case. The Supreme People’s Court (hereinafter referred to as the Supreme People’s Court) twice ruled that the trial was sent back for retrial, but no original copy was still available. Today, a long 10 years later, Tianlun still struggling to walk in the road of human rights.