论文部分内容阅读
作为省级课改实验区的我们,有机会较早接触课标教科书,关于“圆”的内容教材编写,最早是北京师范大学出版社和华东师范大学出版社实施新课改的两种版本(以下简称北师大版、华师大版).它们对圆的有关内容处理风格迥然不同,各有千秋.以下从课标、教材编写、内容设置、习题选择等多方面进行对比研究,以抓住它们的共性,挖掘它们的个性,供教材日臻完善提供微薄之力.1 数学课程标准对“圆”的基本要求
As a provincial curriculum reform experimental zone, we have the opportunity to contact the textbooks for textbooks earlier. About the compilation of the “Circle” content textbooks, the earliest versions of the new curriculum reforms were implemented by the Beijing Normal University Press and the East China Normal University Press ( The following are referred to as “Beijing Normal University Edition” and “China Normal University Edition”. They have different processing styles for the circle. Each has its own merits. The following comparisons are made from the following aspects: curriculum standards, textbook compilation, content setting, and exercise selection. The commonality, to tap their personality, to provide a meager force to improve the teaching materials. 1 The basic requirements of the mathematics curriculum standards on the “circle”