论文部分内容阅读
学术机构自上而下的任命制,以及监督机构缺乏独立性,是学术监督机构不能发挥作用的两大直接原因;当下中国科学界最荒谬之处在于,违规者的收益远远大于违规成本近日来中国学术界热闹非凡,先有“千人计划”学者王志国教授由于论文造假的学术不端行为被推向风口浪尖,紧随其后,又爆出六名专家实名举报中国农业大学前校长石元春涉嫌学术不端。两起事件的共同点就是,当事人都是学界翘楚,事件发生后都没有机构愿意受理此事。
The top-down appointments of academic institutions and the lack of independence of oversight bodies are the two most direct causes of the inability of the academic supervisory body. The most absurd part of the Chinese scientific community at the moment is that the offenders' returns far outweigh the costs of non-compliance To China's academic community crowded with the first “thousands of people plan” scholar Professor Wang Zhiguo due to academic fraud academic misconduct was pushed to the cusp, followed by another burst of six experts, real name report before the president of China Agricultural University Shi Yuanchun suspected of academic misconduct. The common point between the two incidents is that both parties are academics and no one is willing to accept the incident after the incident.