论文部分内容阅读
在我国进入司法改革热潮时,各种问题分析和改革措施被提上了研究日程。但是这些研究都不自觉地建立在法律客观公正的基础上。法律是否客观公正其实早就引起了外国学者的注意,波斯纳的《法理学问题》就对其提出了挑战,对法律的两种分析方法的科学性进行了质疑,从法律的本体论上指出法律的客观性存在问题,并对解释和法律的一些基本概念进行依次反驳。文章在借鉴国外学者较为成熟的研究成果下,通过对我国法律文本结构和影响立法的相关因素的研究、结合我国司法现状,对我国法律是否客观公正进行分析。
When China entered the upsurge of judicial reform, various problems analysis and reform measures were put on the research agenda. However, these studies are unconsciously based on the objective and just laws. The fact that the law is objective and fair has long drawn the attention of foreign scholars. Posner’s “jurisprudence problem” challenged it, questioned the scientific nature of the two methods of law, and pointed out from the legal ontology There are problems with the objectivity of the law, and the basic conceptions of interpretation and law are refuted in turn. Based on the comparatively mature research achievements of foreign scholars, the article analyzes the structure of legal texts in our country and the related factors that affect the legislation, and analyzes the status quo of our country’s judiciary whether the law of our country is objective and fair.