论文部分内容阅读
农民工的命名是农民与工人双重身份的结合,在全球化/工业化/资本主义化的进程中,他们遭受着自由市场和国家体制的双重压迫。在不同的历史时期,农民工被呈现为两幅面孔:一是作为社会进步的表征(20世纪8、90年代之交);二是作为社会苦难的象征(90年代中后期至今),这样两种面孔与农民工既非工人也非农民的主体位置有关。这种尴尬的主体位置使得昔日占据国家主流位置的工人阶级与农民工得以出现在同一个城市空间之中,但他们彼此却视而不见。在发达地区放开户籍制度使有条件的农民工变成都市里的新市民的情况下,以人道主义为核心价值的中产阶级道德成功地获得了农民工等低阶层的霸权效应,占据城市人口大多数的外来工有没有可能形成其他的霸权表述或者历史性的主体位置呢?
The nomenclature of migrant workers is a combination of peasants ’and workers’ dual identities. Under globalization / industrialization / capitalization, they are under the dual pressures of free markets and state institutions. In different historical periods, migrant workers were presented with two faces: one as a symbol of social progress (at the turn of the eight or eighties of the 20th century); the other as a symbol of social misery (since the late 1990s) Kind of faces and migrant workers are neither workers nor peasants in the main position. This awkward position of the main body made the working class and rural migrant workers, which used to occupy the mainstream of the country, appear in the same urban space, but they turned a blind eye to each other. Under the condition of liberalizing the household registration system in developed areas and turning qualified migrant workers into new citizens in the city, the middle class with humanitarian core values succeeded in obtaining the hegemony effect of the lower class of migrant workers and occupying the urban population Is it possible for most migrant workers to form other hegemonic statements or historical subject positions?