论文部分内容阅读
对战后收复区高校接收问题的研究,目前基本上处于空白。有意思的是,北大和清华这两所民国历史上长期并驾齐名且同处一隅的高校,在抗战胜利后接收其原校址、校产过程中的境遇却几乎呈现出天壤之别:北大遭受了最初的冷遇之后很快柳暗花明并取得意外收获,而清华的接收一波三折,长久陷入与军方纠葛的漩涡而不能自拔。文章依据清华大学未开放和其他已公开档案及同期主要报刊资料,在展现战后国民政府复员背景及所选个案接收中侵蚀与维护两种力量交锋之动态场景的基础上,试图揭示高校接收领域的特殊性及其对战后教育现代化的影响。
After the war recovery area colleges and universities to receive the study, at present basically blank. Interestingly, Peking University and Tsinghua University in the history of these two Republics both long-term and well-known and co-located colleges and universities to accept its original address after the victory of the Anti-Japanese War, the school situation in the process of school has almost showed a world of difference: Peking University suffered After the initial cold reception, it quickly came to a surprise and achieved unexpected gains. However, Tsinghua’s reception took a turn for the worse and lasted for a long time into swirling disputes with the military and could not extricate itself. On the basis of the unopened and other open archives of Tsinghua University and the major newspapers and periodicals in the same period, this article tries to reveal the dynamic field of confrontation between the two forces of erosion and maintenance in the background of the demobilization of the postwar government and the reception of selected cases, Its particularity and its impact on post-war educational modernization.