论文部分内容阅读
目的 :研究比较动、静脉性脑梗塞经MRI检查的区别。方法 :回顾性分析我院2012年1月~2015年12月收治的动、静脉性脑梗塞患者各40例,分别对两组患者实施MRI检查,观察并比较两组诊断方式的价值情况。结果 :动脉组诊断结果与病理结果相比无显著差异,静脉组诊断与病理结果相比同样无显著差异;对比两组患者诊断价值情况,发现采用MRI对动、静脉脑梗塞患者进行诊断均能取得较为理想的效果,无明显差异。结论 :MRI检查对两种性质的脑梗塞均有较好的诊断价值,能够较为直观地反映出患者大脑内部缺血情况,对脑梗塞严重程度的判断以及预后的评估提供可靠的依据,对后续的治疗有较为明显的指导作用。
OBJECTIVE: To study the difference between MRI and MRI of arterial and venous cerebral infarction. Methods: Forty patients with arteriovenous and cerebral infarction who were treated in our hospital from January 2012 to December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. The MRI examination was performed on the two groups. The value of the two diagnostic methods was observed and compared. Results: There was no significant difference between the arterial group and the pathological results. There was no significant difference between the vein group and the pathological result. Comparing the diagnostic value of the two groups, it was found that the diagnostic value of the arterial and venous cerebral infarction Obtain the ideal effect, no significant difference. Conclusion: The MRI examination has a good diagnostic value for both types of cerebral infarction, which can reflect the internal ischemic situation of the brain more intuitively, provide a reliable basis for judging the severity of cerebral infarction and evaluating the prognosis, The treatment has a more obvious guiding role.