论文部分内容阅读
前几天,笔者在《新作文》(2008年第1￣2期合刊)上读到了一则关于2007年江苏一高考考生作文《怀想天空·麦收时节》(“麦收时节”是该文的首句)批阅经过:首评阅卷老师给了36分,刚达及格线;二评的老师判给了42分(属于大多数考生都能得到的基本分)。按照预设程序,一评、二评相差6分,它被电脑传给第三位老师。第三位老师判39分。三位老师对它的评价相差不远。
A few days ago, the author read a essay on the 2007 candidates for the Jiangsu Provincial High School Entrance Examination in the “New Composition” (1st to 2nd issue of the 2008 issue), “Way of the Sky and Wheat Harvest” (the “wheat harvest time” is the The first sentence of the article) After review: The first review scored 36 points for the teacher, and reached the pass line. The second assessment teacher awarded 42 points (which is the basic score for most candidates). According to the pre-set procedure, the difference between a comment and a second comment was 6 points. It was passed to the third teacher by the computer. The third teacher scored 39 points. The evaluation of the three teachers is not far off.