论文部分内容阅读
随着经济的不断发展,人们文化水平的日益提高,文检人员面临的检验对象更加复杂多样,文检工作经常会遇到一个个新的课题、新的挑战。在过去的文检工作中,笔者受理了一起要求检验借条上的损毁痕迹是鼠咬形成还是人为破坏所致的案件。在成功完成此案的检验后,笔者收集了大量鼠咬文件的样本,并做了一些模拟实验,通过观察比对,结合案例,谈几点鼠咬文件与人为撕裂分离文件的识别方法,仅供大家参考。
With the continuous development of the economy, people’s cultural level is increasing day by day, and the test objects confronted by the prosecutors are more complicated and diverse. The prosecutorial work often encounters new topics and new challenges. In the past literary inspection work, I accepted a request to test the damage signs on the IOU is caused by the formation of rat bites or man-made damage caused by the case. After the successful completion of the case test, I collected a large number of rat bite file samples and do some simulation experiments, through the observation and comparison, combined with cases, to talk about a few mouse bite files and artificial tear separation file identification method, For your reference.