论文部分内容阅读
在克莱尔案件中,美国联邦最高法院面临死刑案件公平裁决和确保死刑判决终局性之间的冲突。美国联邦最高法院于2012年对克莱尔案件作出终审判决,认为在定罪后人身保护令程序中,死刑案件更换律师的标准应当和非死刑案件一样采用“司法利益”标准。死刑案件的终局性是“司法利益”的关键,死刑案件的公正性是“司法利益”的底线。
In the Clare case, the Supreme Court of the United States faces a conflict between a fair ruling on capital punishment and a final determination of the death penalty. The Supreme Court of the United States made a final judgment on the Clare case in 2012, arguing that the standard of replacing lawyers in death penalty cases should be the same as that of non-capital punishment cases in the post-conviction habeas corpus procedure. The ultimate of death penalty case is the key of “judicial interest ”, and the justice of death penalty case is the bottom line of “judicial interest ”.