论文部分内容阅读
Background and Purpose - Cerebral sinus thrombosis (CST)- needs to be considered in the differential diagnosis of all patients with acute headache. Early diagnosis is essential because early treatment may prevent morbidity and may even be life- saving. Definite exclusion, however, needs advanced neuroradiologic diagnostics, which are not readily available in many hospitals. Because measurement of D- dimers has been demonstrated to be helpful in excluding thromboembolic disease, our aim was to investigate whether D- dimers would be also sensitive enough to exclude CST. Methods - We undertook a prospective multicenter study over a 2.5- year period including all patients who came to the emergency departments with symptoms suggestive of CST. All patients were diagnosed either by magnetic resonance venography,spiral computed tomography scan venography, or intra- arterial digital subtraction angiography. D- dimer levels were measured at admission and analyzed by the same method in all patients. Results - A total of 343 patients were included. CST was diagnosed in 35 patients, of whom 34 had D- dimers above the cutoff value ( > 500 μ g/L). From the 308 patients not having CST, D- dimers were elevated in 27. Sensitivity of D- dimers was 97.1% , with a negative predictive value of 99.6% . Specificity was 91.2% , with a positive predictive value of 55.7% . D- dimers were positively correlated with the extent of the thrombosis and negatively correlated with the duration of symptoms (Spearman rank correlation coefficients 0.76, - 0.58, respectively). Conclusions - D- dimer measurement is useful in patients with suspected CST. Normal D- dimers make the presence of CST very unlikely.
Background and Purpose - Cerebral sinus thrombosis (CST) - needs to be considered in the differential diagnosis of all patients with acute headache. Early diagnosis is essential because early treatment may prevent morbidity and may even be life- saving. Definite exclusion, however, needs advanced measurement of D-dimers has been demonstrated to be helpful in excluding thromboembolic disease, our aim was to investigate whether D- dimers would be also sensitive enough to exclude CST. Methods - All patients were diagnosed either by magnetic resonance venography, spiral computed tomography scan venography, or intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography D-dimer levels were measured at admission and analyzed by the same method in all patien Results from A total of 343 patients were included. CST was diagnosed in 35 patients, of whom 34 had D-dimers above the cutoff value (> 500 μ g / L). From the 308 patients not having CST, D-dimers were elevated in 27. Sensitivity of D-dimers was 97.1% with a negative predictive value of 99.6%. Specificity was 91.2% with a positive predictive value of 55.7%. D-dimers were positively correlated with the extent of the thrombosis and negatively correlated with the duration of symptoms (Spearman rank correlation coefficients 0.76, -0.58, respectively). Conclusions - D-dimer measurement is useful in patients with suspected CST. Normal D-dimers make the presence of CST very unlikely.