论文部分内容阅读
细读万方数据跨库检索的近三年来各类期刊刊发的吴敬梓研究文章,发现存在一些编校问题,归纳为六个方面:(1)错,即错别字、错标点、错页码;(2)混,即作者在同一篇文章中所叙述的史料混乱或同一史料标注混乱;(3)歧,即歧义;(4)漏,即漏字、漏标点符号;(5)多,即多字、多标点符号;(6)省,即省略。出现原因源于:(1)拿来主义;(2)学术功底不扎实;(3)学术态度不严谨;(4)技术层面问题。为此提出了一些编校建议,以期引起从事吴敬梓研究的学者和编校们的关注,精益求精,进一步提升吴敬梓研究文章的质量。
To read the research articles of Wu Jingzi published in all kinds of journals in the past three years by Wanfang Data Cross-library Retrieval, we found that there are some problems in programming, which are summarized in six aspects: (1) Wrong, that is, typos, wrong punctuation, wrong page number; ) Confusion, namely the author in the same article described in the confusion of the historical data or the same historical annotation confusion; (3) disambiguation, that is, ambiguity; (4) leakage, that is missing words, missing punctuation; , More punctuation; (6) Province, that is omitted. The reasons for this are as follows: (1) Incitement; (2) Academic foundation is not solid; (3) Academic attitude is not rigorous; and (4) technical aspects. To this end, a number of editorial suggestions have been put forward with a view to arousing the concern of scholars and editors who are engaged in the research of Wu Jingzi and improving the quality of Wu Jingzi’s research articles.