论文部分内容阅读
提出抗诉是我国检察机关进行民事检察监督的法定方式。然而,关于检察机关在民事抗诉中是否享有证据调查权,立法却总是疏于言及,司法解释又各行其是,由此引发了实践中的诸多矛盾和冲突。为了进一步规范民事检察监督机制,有必要在正确认知其内涵及正当性的基础上,通过立法直接肯定人民检察院在民事抗诉中享有证据调查权,并借助于检察司法解释对其范围、行使方式和内容加以规制。
Putting forward protesting is the legal method for procuratorial organs to conduct procuratorial supervision in our country. However, as to whether the procuratorial organs have the right to investigate evidence in the civil protest, the legislation is always neglected and the judicial interpretations go its own course, provoking many contradictions and conflicts in practice. In order to further standardize the mechanism of civil procuratorial supervision, on the basis of correctly understanding its connotation and legitimacy, it is necessary to directly affirm that the People’s Procuratorate enjoys the right of investigation and investigation in the civil protest through legislation and that the scope and mode of exercising And content to be regulated.