论文部分内容阅读
道安“本无”说的具体涵义一直是学术界一个争论比较大的问题。本文通过对相关材料的勾陈 ,对道安“本无”说内容的辨析 ,否定了认为道安的“本无”说是最接近于鸠摩罗什、僧肇所阐发的般若学“空”义的观点 ,认为道安所理解的“空”从总体而言仍然与魏晋玄学“以无为本”思想的思路是一致的。道安在“本无”说中所表现出的特点表明他在佛教般若学与魏晋玄学的交融过程中是一个过渡性的 ,同时又是十分重要的佛教思想家。
The concrete connotation of the “no” theory of Taoism has always been a controversial issue in academia. Through the analysis of the relevant materials, this dissertation analyzes the content of the “non-existence” of the Dao An and negates the “natural” theory that the Daoism is the closest to Kumarajiva ’s “emptiness” On the whole, it is still consistent with the idea of metaphysics “metaphysics” in Wei and Jin Dynasties. The characteristics of Daan in his “no” theory show that he is a transitional and very important Buddhist thinker in the process of the blending of Buddhism and Wei-Jin metaphysics.