论文部分内容阅读
卷宗笔录是中国刑事法官主要的裁判依据,是法庭审判流于形式的主要原因。比较研究发现在欧洲大陆国家,卷宗笔录的使用并没有阻碍现代刑事诉讼审判中心主义的实现,卷宗笔录已然成为整个诉讼运行机制的一环。比较研究的结果为我国卷宗笔录正当化提供了进路——侦查行为合法化的司法审查,辩护律师及时全面的阅卷权利保障,包括证据规则在内的直接、言词原则的法庭审判,卷宗笔录便仅仅是用于记载侦查过程,固定依法形成的证据信息,辅助法庭审判的材料。
The record of the file is the main referee basis of the Chinese criminal judge and the main reason that the trial of the court is in the form of formality. The comparative study found that the use of file records in European continent did not hinder the realization of modern criminal procedure trial-centering doctrine, and the record of the file has become a part of the operating mechanism of litigation. The results of the comparative study provide a justification for the justification of the record-keeping of the files in our country - judicial review of legal acts of investigation, timely and comprehensive protection of the rights of the reviewers, direct and verbal rules including evidence rules, court trials, Merely used to record the investigation process, the fixed evidence of the formation of evidence, auxiliary court trial material.