论文部分内容阅读
在产权制度创新的目标选择上有两种截然不同的主张。一种是把国有制等同于公有制,认为坚持公有制为主体,就必须坚持以国有经济为主体,就必须保持国有产权在企业乃至整个国民经济中的绝对控股地位。放弃国有产权就意味着放弃公有制的阵地,就会危及社会主义的基本经济制度。另一种认为,市场经济是建立在主体明确、边界清晰的私有产权基础上的。我国要建立市场经济体制,必须实行私有制。国有产权同市场经济是不相容的,只有实行私有化,才是产权改革的唯一出路。这两种看法都是片面的。产权改革既不能维持国有产权“一统天下”或“一股独大”的现状,同样也不能搞私有产
There are two completely different opinions on the target choice of property system innovation. One is to equate state ownership with public ownership and hold that public ownership is the mainstay. Therefore, we must insist on taking the state-owned economy as the mainstay and must maintain the absolute controlling position of state-owned property rights in enterprises as well as in the entire national economy. Abandoning state-owned property rights means abandoning the position of public ownership and endangering the basic economic system of socialism. Another view is that the market economy is based on a clear private ownership of a clear and defined boundary. To establish a market economy system in our country, we must implement private ownership. State-owned property is incompatible with the market economy. Only privatization is the only way out of property rights reform. Both of these views are one-sided. Property rights reform can not maintain the status quo of state-owned property rights “dominate the world ” or “a dominance ”, the same can not engage in private property