论文部分内容阅读
目的:评价3种治疗高血压病方案的经济性和依从性。方法:210例原发性高血压患者随机分成3组,分别给与3种不同治疗方案,治疗过程中用问卷调查及随访表形式,量化患者依从性情况;治疗6个月,观察临床疗效,运用药物经济学的成本-效果分析方法进行评价。结果:3种方案有效率分别为90.0%、88.6%、82.9%;成本分别为752.64、903.26、287.84元。通过调查与随访,A组患者依从性最佳。结论:高血压病的医院治疗应科学选用治疗药物,为患者制定经济、合理、安全、有效的治疗方案。综合考虑,A组为最佳治疗方案。
PURPOSE: To evaluate the economics and compliance of three treatment options for hypertension. Methods: A total of 210 patients with essential hypertension were randomly divided into 3 groups and were given 3 different treatment regimens respectively. During the treatment, questionnaires and follow-up forms were used to quantify patient compliance. After 6 months of treatment, the clinical efficacy, Use cost-effectiveness analysis of pharmacoeconomics to evaluate. Results: The effective rates of the three schemes were 90.0%, 88.6% and 82.9% respectively; the costs were 752.64, 903.26 and 2887.84 yuan respectively. Through investigation and follow-up, patients in group A had the best compliance. Conclusion: Hypertensive hospital treatment should be scientifically selected for treatment of drugs for patients to develop an economical, reasonable, safe and effective treatment options. Taken together, A group for the best treatment.