论文部分内容阅读
新颖性是编辑需要坚持的一条重要审稿标准。关于新颖性标准的内涵,出版理论界至今仍众说纷纭,莫衷一是,这无疑影响了编辑在实际工作中对新颖性标准的把握和执行。有位很有声望的外国学者说:中国每年有上千篇的中国古代史论文发表,但是可读的并不多。这话虽有点夸大且只为针对中国古代史研究而言,但其反映出来的某种倾向于出版界则普遍存在,即缺少创见、毫无“新颖”之处的作品在时下出版物中占了相当多的份量。本文根据辩证唯物主义关于时间、空间和结构是事物三种存在方式与固有属性的观点,将新颖性标准相应划分为体现时间存在形态的新的问题和新的观念、体现空间存在形态的新的领域和新的材料、体现结构存在形态的新的方法和新的角度六个类型,依次略作申述,以求教于编辑界同仁。
Novelty is an important standard for review that editors need to adhere to. As for the connotation of the novelty standard, there are still many different opinions in the publishing theory circle, which undoubtedly affects the editors’ grasp and implementation of the novelty standard in their practical work. A very influential foreign scholar said: China publishes thousands of articles on ancient Chinese history every year, but not many people read it. Although these words are somewhat exaggerated and only for the study of ancient Chinese history, some of the tendencies reflected in the publishing industry are ubiquitous: the lack of inventiveness and the novelness of the work account for A considerable amount of weight. According to dialectical materialism’s point of view that time, space and structure are three existential ways and inherent properties of things, the criterion of novelty is divided correspondingly into new problems and new concepts that reflect the existing form of time, new ones that reflect the existing form of space Fields and new materials, six new types of methods and new perspectives that reflect the existence of structures, and a few minor ones in order to seek advice from colleagues in the editing field.