论文部分内容阅读
高考也会出错题?真是一件闻所未闻的事。作为一个曾经历高考的过来人,我清楚地记得高中班主任以一种正言厉色而又颇带几分自豪的口吻给我们讲过高考出题的严谨和规范:“高考命题组的专家成堆,个个都是研究生以上学历。出题期间全封闭管理,每道题都经过反复研究、论证……”可是,现在,高考真的出错题啦!现在我们知道,教育部出面了,承诺有错误会改正。可是很多人不知道,这个承诺来得何其艰难啊。其实回过头来看,不就是一道小题吗,分值不高,对整体阅卷似无大碍。何况高考实施了几十年,出现次把错误,实属正常。人非圣贤,孰能无过。专家犯错,不足为奇。奇怪的是,当初有人发现了问题,向上反映时,有关方面不是赶紧去纠正错误,澄清问题,而是组织了一轮又一轮专家“论证”,然后一次又一次宣布“试题无错”。直到经过中科院院士的不断争论、呼吁,引起媒体与公众广泛关注时,眼看纸包不住火了,有关方面才出面表态“有错必纠”。面子值千金?国人自古就重视面子,专家的面子想必就更值钱了。当然也有实际的考虑,比如担心考生因错题要求重新判分。但后来的事态表明,这并没成为一个问题。我们的教育者在教导下一代时,想必不会缺失“勇于承担错误”这样的美德,可是当错误出现在自己身上,需要自己来承担后果时,勇气哪里去了?
The college entrance examination will also make mistakes. It is really unheard of. As a person who has ever gone through the college entrance examination, I clearly remember that the senior high school class teacher gave us the rigor and specification of the entrance exam in a kind of polite and somewhat proud tone: “The experts in the college entrance examination proposition group have a pile of All of them are graduate students or above. During the period of the problem, they were completely closed management, and each question has undergone repeated studies and demonstrations. “But now, the entrance exam is really wrong! Now we know that the Ministry of Education has come forward and promised to make mistakes. correct. However, many people do not know how hard this promise has come. In fact, looking back, isn’t it a small question? The score is not high, and it seems to have no effect on the overall reading. Not to mention the implementation of the college entrance examination for several decades, the occurrence of mistakes, it is normal. People can not escape from doing wrong. It is not surprising that experts make mistakes. The strange thing is that when someone discovered a problem and reflected it upwards, the relevant parties did not hurry to correct the mistakes and clarify the problem. Instead, they organized rounds of expert “argumentation” and then announced over and over again that “the test questions were not wrong”. Until the controversy and appeal of academicians of the Chinese Academy of Sciences attracted widespread media and public attention, the paper couldn’t stand fire, and the relevant parties came forward to say that ”there is always wrong." Face value of daughter? Since ancient times people have paid attention to face, the face of experts must be more valuable. Of course, there are practical considerations, such as worrying that candidates will re-evaluate due to incorrect questions. But later events showed that this did not become a problem. When our educators are teaching the next generation, they must not lose the virtue of “bravely accepting mistakes.” But where does the error occur on oneself and needs to bear the consequences? Where does courage go?