论文部分内容阅读
目的分析不同雾化吸入方式治疗小儿哮喘的效果。方法选取本院2015年1月~2015年12月收治的小儿哮喘患者84例作为研究对象,用随机数法分为甲组和乙组,各42例。甲组应用空气压缩泵雾化吸入、乙组应用超声雾化吸入。对两组患儿的临床效果和通气改善结果进行观察对比。结果甲组患儿的临床治疗总有效率明稍高于乙组,组间比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);甲组患儿的动脉血氧分压和FVC指标优于乙组,对比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);甲组患儿不良反应发生率相对较低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对比超声雾化吸入,空气压缩泵治疗小儿哮喘对于通气功能的改善结果更好且不良反应更少,值得应用。
Objective To analyze the effect of different inhalation therapy on children asthma. Methods Eighty-four pediatric patients with asthma admitted from January 2015 to December 2015 in our hospital were selected as the study subjects, divided into group A and group B with 42 cases in random number. A group using air compression pump atomization inhalation, B group using ultrasonic atomization inhalation. The clinical effects of two groups of children and ventilation to improve the results were observed and compared. Results The total effective rate of clinical treatment of children in group A was slightly higher than that in group B, there was no significant difference between the two groups (P> 0.05). The partial pressure of arterial oxygen and FVC in group A were better than those in group B , The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in group A was relatively low, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion Compared with ultrasonic atomization inhalation, air compression pump treatment of pediatric asthma for better ventilation and better outcome with fewer adverse reactions, it is worth applying.