论文部分内容阅读
事情的缘起多年以来,关于“《鲁迅传》创作组访谈记录”、“毛鲁会见”和“周作人敌伪时期史料问题”的论争,一直为文化界和读者所瞩目。陈漱渝、陈福康等人以学者专家的名义,极力诬陷上述史料的调查整理者沈鹏年,胡说沈捏造史料,招摇撞骗,是上海滩文痞、学术骗子、政治骗子。作为知情者,我认为现在是廓清迷雾的时候了,追本溯源,也不得不请出沈的老师和朋友唐弢来作证。2004年7月2日上海《文汇读书周报》,记者彭伦以《四十年前〈鲁迅传〉访谈记录‘浮出水面’》为题,头版头条报道作家陈村喜获1960年上海天马电影制片厂内部资料《〈鲁迅传〉创作组
The Origins of Things Over the years, the controversy over the interviews recorded by the writing team of the “Biography of Lu Xun”, the meeting between the Mao Houlu and the historical materials on Zhou Zuoren during the enemy and puppet periods has drawn the attention of the cultural circles and readers alike. Chen Shuyu, Chen Fukang and others, in the name of scholars and experts, framed Shen Pengnian, the investigator and arranger of the above-mentioned historical materials, who fabricated the historical materials and resorted to cheating and cheating. As an insider, I think it is time to clarify the fog. To trace this source, we have to ask Tang Tao, a teacher and friend of Shen, to testify. On July 2, 2004, Shanghai Wen Wei Weekly Reading, reporter Peng Lun, made a headline coverage of writer Chen Cunxiu in his 1960 interview with “Lu Xun Biography> Interview Records 40 Years Ago” Tianma movie studio internal information " creative group