论文部分内容阅读
案件事实是据以对犯罪嫌疑人提出处理意见的至关重要的依据。对案件事实的叙述,一方面必须疏而不漏地叙写清能论证罪名成立的犯罪构成要件,达到论罪准确;另一方面还必须运用正确的叙述方法,达到叙写条理清晰,只有这两者完美结合,方能写出高质量的公安刑事法律文书。目前各种有关资料对案件事实的叙述方法讨论不细,只涉及顺序法、突出主罪法、突出主犯法。事实上,案件事实的叙述的确十分复杂,须根据不同的案情运用不同的叙写方法,此三种方法有其很大的局限性。本文试根据
The facts of the case are based on the crime suspects to deal with the views of the crucial basis. On the one hand, the narrative of the facts of the case must be sparsely narrated the constitutional elements of the criminal conviction of Qingne to justify the crime; on the other hand, the correct narration must be used to achieve a clear and concise narrative. Only these two The perfect combination, in order to write high-quality public security criminal legal instruments. At present, all the relevant data do not discuss the narrative method of the facts of the case very well. They only deal with the ordinal law, highlighting the main culpability laws and highlighting the main culprit laws. In fact, the facts of the case are indeed very complicated. Different forms of narrative must be used according to different circumstances. These three methods have their own limitations. This article based on trial