论文部分内容阅读
目的：探究在妇科腔镜手术中，静吸复合麻醉与全凭静脉麻醉的苏醒速度以及安全性。方法：选择2016年2月-2016年8月之间在我院进行妇科腔镜手术的患者50例，应用随机数字表发将所有患者随机分为两组，实验组与对照组各25例，实验组采用静吸复合的麻醉方式，对照组采用全凭静脉麻醉的麻醉方式。比较两组患者的苏醒时间以及不良反应发生情况。结果：实验组自主呼吸恢复时间、拔管时间，睁眼时间，回答名字时间均明显短于对照组（p<0.05）。实验组不良反应发生率为12%，对照组不良反应发生率为28%，两组相比有统计学差异（p<0.05）。结论：在妇科腔镜手术中，应用静吸复合的麻醉方式比应用全凭静脉麻醉苏醒时间短且安全性高，可以在临床上推广。“,”objective:To explore the cavity mirror in the operation of department of gynaecology, static absorption compound anesthesia and al by waking up speed and safety of intravenous anesthesia. Methods:Between February 2016-August 2016 in our hospital in 50 patients with gynecologic endoscopy surgery, application of random number table to send al of the patients were randomly divided into two groups, experimental group and the control group (n=25), the experimental group USES the static absorption compound anesthesia, control group by intravenous anesthesia used way of anesthesia. Comparison of two groups of patients awakening time and adverse reactions occur. Results:The spontaneous breathing recovery time and extubation time, open time and answer the name time were signiifcantly shorter than the control group (p<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions was 12%, controls the incidence of adverse reactions was 28%, compared two groups have statistical difference (p<0.05). Conclusion:In gynecologic surgery of cavity mirrors, static absorption compound anesthesia than application al by intravenous anesthesia to short time and high safety, can be popularized in clinic.