论文部分内容阅读
《中国大百科全书·哲学》中关于《老子》者,撰稿先生多据通行本为说,然通行本讹文多有,故撰稿释文不免有误;即或王弼注亦多歧解,如“谷神不死”、“重为轻根”。宋徽宗政和四年(1114年)晁说之跋文曰:“其文字则多谬误,殆有不可读者。”至乎孝宗乾道六年(1170年)熊克镂版而谬误相承,是又五十余年矣。至乎明神宗万历中张之象刻本,则又四百余年,而清初四库馆臣以张之象本录出王注,校以《永乐大典》本,故正文多从河上公本,是所谓通行本,其中正文、注文有不相应者,有与范应元所见王本相异者,然而通行于今,学者或据以为说,说之而误。本全书《老子》相关条目之撰文学者有刘蔚华先生、许抗生先生、朱贻庭先生、赵宗正先生、王明先生,并为前辈学者,唯所据本误,故误释不免,是可得而为文指瑕也。
According to the passage of this article, the author of “Lao Tzu” in “Encyclopedia of China Encyclopedia of Philosophy” said that although the passage of this erroneous text often leads to an unavoidable mistake in the interpretation of the written article, that is, Such as “Valley God undead ”, “heavy for the light root ”. Song Huizong governance and four years (1114) Chao Shu postscript reads: “The text is more than a fallacious, almost unreadable.” “To almost four years of Xiaozong Road (1170) Xiong Ke Lou version of Fallacy, is another five More than ten years. To the Ming God Wanli in the image of Zhang carved, then another four hundred years, and the Qing court writer in the four Zhang as the book recorded Wang Note, the school to ”Paradise“, so the text from the river on the capital , Is the so-called capital, the text, note there is no corresponding person, there are different with the king of Fan Yingyuan those who, however, nowadays, scholars or according to that, to say and wrong. The author of the book, ”Lao Tzu" related articles, is Mr. Liu Weihua, Mr. Xu Kangsheng, Mr. Zhu Yi Ting, Mr. Zhao Zongzheng, Mr. Wang Ming, and scholar of predecessors. Text refers to flaws also.