论文部分内容阅读
目的探讨输卵管妊娠应用腹腔镜手术与传统开腹手术的治疗效果,以丰富临床治疗经验。方法 56例行输卵管妊娠手术的患者,随机分成对照组与观察组,各28例,对照组给予传统开腹手术,观察组给予腹腔镜手术。统计两组的临床治疗结果 ,并进行对比。结果两组患者的手术时间以及术中出血量比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);观察组的术后下床活动时间、肛门排气时间、住院时间显著低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组的住院费用高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论输卵管妊娠应用腹腔镜手术疗效更为显著,减轻了患者的痛苦,安全有效,值得临床推广。
Objective To investigate the therapeutic effect of laparoscopic surgery and traditional laparotomy in tubal pregnancy in order to enrich clinical experience. Methods 56 cases of tubal pregnancy surgery were randomly divided into control group and observation group, 28 cases in each group. The control group was given laparotomy and the observation group was given laparoscopic surgery. Statistics of the two groups of clinical treatment results, and compared. Results There was no significant difference in operative time and blood loss between the two groups (P> 0.05). The time of ambulation, anal exhaust time and hospital stay in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group Statistical significance (P <0.05); The hospitalization cost of the observation group was higher than that of the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusions Laparoscopic surgery for tubal pregnancy is more effective and less painful, safe and effective, and worthy of clinical promotion.