论文部分内容阅读
新修改的《行政诉讼法》第一次明确用法律形式把行政协议归结到受案范围内,其为立法上的重大发展。于现行法整合受理行政合同案件程序前,实践中的几种处理方法使得行政合同的行政性与合同性的双重特征不断地被遗忘。迄今为止,尽管行政合同案件的审判与处理程序不会成为主要矛盾,但现行法规定的行政主体一直为被告,其单方面的救助路径、举证责任大多是被告负担的处理方法、相比较而言较为单一的判决类型涵义都不助于行政合同争议地有效处理。
For the first time, the newly revised “Administrative Procedure Law” clearly laid down the administrative agreement in the scope of acceptance by law, which is a major legislative development. Before the current law incorporates and accepts the procedure of administrative contract cases, several handling methods in practice make the administrative and contractual double features of the administrative contract constantly being forgotten. So far, though the procedure of adjudication and handling of administrative contract cases will not be the main contradiction, the administrative body under the current law has always been the defendant. The sole remedy path and the burden of proof are mostly the burden of defendants, which is comparatively comparatively A single type of judgment does not help the effective settlement of administrative disputes.