对王军《政府管制的经济和法律问题——北京市出租汽车业个案分析》一文的评论

• 作 者: 张燕生
• 出 处: 中国制度变迁的案例研究
• 发表日期: 2004年00期
• 关键词: 当事方 经营特许权 学案 和法 案例研究 资源流向 中国制度变迁 个体投资者 放松管制 承包合同

第一点,案例不足之处是:案例所涉及的当事方。如政府、企业、司机、消费者,以及局外的经济学家和法学案,全国人大代表几次在全国人大所提交的提案。主要看到的是政府管制的描述,其他几个很重要的当事方对政府三个方面的管制的看法与不同意见在案例中表述的不够充分,导致难以启发人们的思考。我联想到哈佛大学一个非常精彩的案例,讲20世纪80年代的美

First, the inadequacies of the case are: the parties involved in the case. Such as the government, enterprises, drivers, consumers, as well as outside the economists and jurisprudence, NPC deputies submitted several proposals at the NPC. What is mainly seen is the description of government control. The views and opinions of the other three important parties on the three aspects of government control are not fully expressed in the case, which makes it hard to inspire people’s thinking. I think of Harvard University, a very wonderful case about the beauty of the 1980s