论文部分内容阅读
在现代,哲学影响着中国人的思想。如果要想避免对中国传统思想做出简单的解释,在理解传统思想之前,则需要对其整个框架以及意境进行理解。在把中国思想进行问题化之前,需要试着把哲学也问题化。这需要我们在哲学中找到可以评价中国思想的哲学观点,并将这一观点变成追问的对象。本文以哲学问题化为基础,重新对中国思想进行解释,以牟宗三为例,评价四因说在解释中国思想时的局限性;以海德格尔为中心,评价哲学第一开端在解释西方哲学终结时的片面性;以亚里士多德哲学为前提,讨论哲学第一开端的在历史中的含义,并参考《周易》、《中庸》等古典儒家文学;最后对哲学在中国思想中重新开始的可能性进行解答。
In modern times, philosophy influenced the Chinese people’s thinking. If you want to avoid making a simple explanation of Chinese traditional thinking, you need to understand its entire framework and its mood before you understand the traditional thinking. Before problem-solving Chinese thinking, we need to try to solve the problem of philosophy as well. This requires us to find a philosophical view of philosophy that can evaluate Chinese thought and turn this view into the object of questioning. Based on the philosophical problems, this paper re-interprets the Chinese thought. Taking Mou Zongsan as an example, this article evaluates the limitations of the four-point theory in explaining Chinese thought. With Heidegger as the center, the evaluation philosophy begins with the interpretation of western philosophy The one-sidedness at the end of the era; Aristotle’s philosophy as a prerequisite to discuss the philosophical beginning of the first in the history of meaning, and with reference to the “Book of Changes”, “Golden Mean” and other classical Confucianism; Finally, philosophy in the Chinese thought back The possibility to answer.