论文部分内容阅读
对121例危重新生儿进行了“新生儿急性生理学评分(SNAP)”,“新生儿治疗强度评分(NTISS)”、及“新生儿临床危险指数(CRIB)”三种方法的回顾性评分。结果显示:①死亡组分值显著高于存活组;②体重越小分值越高;③存活组住院时间长者分值高于住院期间短者。作者认为三种评分方法中SNAP及CRIB对评估疾病严重程度、揭示预后、指导临床治疗有一定实用意义,可以在我国推广,并对我国制定评分体系提出了建议。
121 critically ill newborns were retrospectively scored on three methods, namely, SNAP, NTISS, and CRIB. The results showed that: ① the death component was significantly higher than the survival group; ② The higher the weight value, the higher the score; ③ The survival time of the elderly in hospitalization was higher than the shorter hospitalization. The authors believe that SNAP and CRIB in the three scoring methods have some practical significance for assessing the severity of the disease, revealing the prognosis and guiding the clinical treatment, which can be popularized in our country and put forward some suggestions for setting the scoring system in our country.