论文部分内容阅读
随着客观归责理论研究的深化,规范保护目的理论引起我国刑法学界广泛的学术兴趣。举例来说,张明楷教授在探讨交通肇事罪时指出,交通肇事的结果必须由违反规范保护目的的行为所引起,例如,交通运输管理法规禁止酒后驾驶的目的,是为了防止驾驶者因为饮酒而导致驾驶能力减退或者丧失进而造成交通事故。如果酒后驾驶并未导致驾驶能力减退或丧失,而是由于车辆出现驾驶者不能预见的刹车故障而造成交通事故,对驾驶者不能以交通肇事罪论处。~([1])梁根林教授在探讨危险驾驶罪时也认为,认定醉驾型危险驾驶罪,必须结合刑法规范保护目的,对包含暗示罪量要素的“裸”的“醉驾”行为事实进行规范限缩。~([2])问题是,虽然两位学者在“规范保护目的具
With the deepening of the research on objective imputation theory, the theory of protecting purpose has aroused a wide range of academic interests in criminal law academia in our country. For example, Professor Zhang Mingkai pointed out in his study on traffic accident crime that the result of a traffic accident must be caused by acts that violate the normative protection purpose. For example, the purpose of traffic regulation prohibiting drunk driving is to prevent the driver from drinking alcohol because of drinking Resulting in diminished driving ability or loss and thus cause traffic accidents. If drunk driving did not result in loss of driving ability or loss, but because of the vehicle driver’s unexpected brake failure caused by traffic accidents, the driver can not be the crime of traffic accident. When discussing the crime of dangerous driving, Professor Liang Genlin also believes that in cognizance of the crime of driving a dangerous driving in drunk driving style, the behavior of ”nude “ The fact that the specification limit. The problem is that although [...] both scholars ”regulate the purpose of protection