论文部分内容阅读
目的对比分析对布氏菌病患者分别采取细菌学检验以及血清学检验的应用效果。方法 41例布氏菌病患者,对所有患者均采取细菌学检验以及血清学检验,对比分析两种检验方法对该病的检出率。结果检验后,细菌学检验方法共检出布氏菌病阳性患者17例,检出率41.5%;血清学检验方法共检出布氏菌病阳性患者25例,检出率61.0%。两种检验方法检出率比较差异无统计学意义(χ~2=3.124,P=0.077>0.05)。结论在布氏菌病的临床检验过程中,细菌学检验以及血清学检验均有十分重要的临床作用,采用任何一种检验方法均有其优势之处。在具体的临床诊断中,医生应依据不同患者的不同情况来选择合理有效的检验方法。
Objective To compare and analyze the effect of bacteriological test and serological test on brucellosis patients. Methods 41 cases of brucellosis patients, all patients were taken bacteriological and serological tests, comparative analysis of the two test methods for the detection rate of the disease. Results After the test, 17 cases of brucellosis-positive patients were detected by bacteriological test, the detection rate was 41.5%; 25 cases of brucellosis-positive patients were detected by serological test, the detection rate was 61.0%. There was no significant difference between the two test methods (χ ~ 2 = 3.124, P = 0.077> 0.05). Conclusion Bacteriological tests and serological tests have very important clinical effects in the clinical test of brucellosis. Any test method has its advantages. In the specific clinical diagnosis, doctors should be based on different situations in different patients to choose a reasonable and effective test methods.