论文部分内容阅读
关于李自成的归宿问题已经讨论很久,争论的焦点是被地方武装杀于湖北通山,还是脱身逃至湖南石门夹山寺为僧?主张夹山为僧说者认为:一、清初关于李自成死于湖北通山的各种记载均不可信;二、湖南石门地方发现的历史资料可以证明李自成最后到夹山当了和尚,①那么事实到底如何?现在就从这两个方面进行一番探讨,探讨的原则,一是对前人的记载应该以事实为依据,二是要言之成理,即对事实的分析要合情合理,不能把我
Li Zicheng's fate about the issue has been discussed for a long time, the focus of the debate was killed by local armed Tongshan in Hubei, or escape to escape to Hunan Shimen Temple for the monk? Advocated for the monk said that the mountain: First, the early Qing dynasty about the death of Li Zicheng Hubei Tongshan various records are not credible; Second, the historical data found in Hunan Shimen place can prove that Li Zicheng finally came to the folder as a monk, ① then the fact that in the end? Now from these two aspects of a discussion to explore Principle, the first is the record of the predecessors should be based on facts, the second is to say the truth, that the fact that the analysis should be reasonable and can not put me