论文部分内容阅读
道德合理性的传统辩护模式是通过自由与道德之间的相关性来进行的,自律和他律作为道德上的两种代表性的观点分别指认了自由与道德之间的肯定性和否定性的关系。西方文化的自由是通过理性来规定的,它以个体本位主义为实质,其道德观由于错置了自由的根基,因而不能为道德提供真正的合理性辩护。只有从历史性、实践性、交往性和个体性的完整统一体的“生活世界”出发,重置自由和理性,才能对道德合理性辩护做出新的理解
The traditional mode of defense of moral rationality is carried out through the correlation between freedom and morality. Self-discipline and self-righteousness, as two representative moral ideas, respectively identify the positive and the negative between freedom and morality relationship. The freedom of the western culture is regulated by reason. It takes the individualism as its essence, and its morality can not provide a true justification for morality because it misplaced the foundation of freedom. Only by starting from the “living world” of the complete unity of history, practice, intercourse and individuality, we can make a new understanding of the justification of moral rationality by resetting freedom and rationality