论文部分内容阅读
近来,一些学术论文在论及近代中国海防战略时,有的作者把林则徐、魏源都说成是消极防御论者,也有的只把魏源说成消极防御论者。现将其有关论点摘录于后。马金旗写的《中日两国近代海防理论和政策之比较》(《军事历史》1991年第5期)一文中说:“从林则徐的‘以守为战,以逸待劳’,魏源的‘守外洋不如守海口,守海口不如守内河’到李鸿章的守京畿、守长江,置其它地区于不顾的重点防守法,都把防守当作海防战略的核心,防守既是目的也是唯一的手段。这样,就忽视了防守战略中的主动进攻的原则,变防守战略为消极的专守防卫,在实践中往往趋同坐困,不能做到以战助守。”
Recently, some academic dissertations refer to both Lin Zexu and Wei Yuan as passive defensiveists when discussing modern coastal defense strategies in China, while others only regard Wei Yuan as a passive defensive commentator. The relevant arguments are now excerpted. In his article “Comparison of Modern Coast Defense Theory and Policy between China and Japan” (Military History, 1991, No. 5, 1991) written by Ma Jinqi: "From Lin Zexu’s defensive war, Keep the Haikou, keep the Haikou better than keep the river ’to Li Hongzhang’s Shou Gyeonggi Province, keep the Yangtze River, set other areas in disregard of the focus on defense, regard defense as the core of the defense strategy, defense is both the purpose and the only means. The principle of active attack in the defensive strategy, defensive strategy to negatively guarding the defensive, in practice tend to converge, unable to do so.