论文部分内容阅读
目的:探讨针对各型注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)患者,对其脑电图发生的变化进行分析.方法:选择我院2013年05月--2015年05月ADHD患者76例,临床对其实施脑电图检查.选择IVA-CPT(视听整合连续性测试)对患者实施疾病分型.最终针对各型患者在脑电图方面发生的变化进行分析.结果:在所有患者中,表现为脑电图正常的患者54例,所占百分比为71.05%;表现为脑电图异常的患者22例,所占百分比为28.95%;针对表现出脑电图异常改变的患者,全部属于非特异性变化.对患者实施IVA-CPT检查,最终表示正常的患者9例(11.84%),注意缺陷表现为主型的患者20例(26.32%),多动/冲动表现为主型的患者13例(17.11%);表现为混合型的患者20例(26.32%),表现为多动无效的患者14例(1842%).各种类型患者在脑电图异常率方面,未表现出显著差异(P〉0.05).结论:针对ADHD患者,其在脑电图改变方面未表现出显著的特异性,针对表现为不同亚型的患者,其在脑电图异常率方面,未表现出明显的差异. “,”objective:to study on various attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) patients, to analyze the electroencephalogram (eeg) changes.Methods:from May 2013-05, 2015 ADHD patients 76 cases, on its clinical electroencephalography (eeg) examination. Choose IVA - CPT (audio-visual integration continuity test) for patients with diseases. Finally on electroencephalogram (eeg) in patients with various changes are analyzed.Results:in all children, in the form of electroencephalogram (eeg) in patients with normal 54 cases, the percentage is 71.05%; Characterized by abnormal electroencephalogram (eeg) of 22 cases of patients, the percentage is 28.95%; In view of the patients showed abnormal eeg change, all belong to the nonspecific changes. For patients with IVA CPT inspection, finally said patients with normal 9 cases (11.84%), attention deficit in patients with type performance of 20 cases (26.32%), hyperactivity in patients with type/impulse performance of 13 cases (17.11%). Show the hybrid of 20 cases (26.32%) patients, 14 patients with performance is still invalid (18.42%). Eeg abnormal rate in patients with various types, showed no significant difference (P〈0.05). Conclusion: in view of the ADHD patients, the eeg showed no significant change of specificity, in view of the performance for the patients with different subtypes, the abnormal eeg rate, showed no obvious difference.