论文部分内容阅读
目的：比较两种不同胆囊切除术的手术方式在临床疗效及住院费用方面的差别，探索胆囊良性病变的手术方式。方法190例胆囊良性病变患者随机分成两个组，腹腔镜组98例，小切口组92例，分别进行两种不同的手术方式。结果腹腔镜组手术的持续时间，术后肛门排气时间，卧床时间，平均住院天数，并发症发生率比小切口胆囊切除术明显减少(P<0.05)；而平均住院费用小切口组明显少于腹腔镜组(P0.05)。结论两种手术方式均可用于胆囊良性病变，但是不需要特殊设备的小切口胆囊切除术更适合在基层医院中大力推广应用。“,”Objective To compare two dif erent cholecystectomy operation mode in clinical and hospital costs in terms of dif erential, exploring the operation way of benign gal bladder disease. Methods 190 cases of benign gal bladder disease were randomly divided into two groups, 98 cases of smal incision in laparoscopic group, group of 92 patients, were performed on two dif erent operation modes. Results The laparoscopic group operation duration, postoperative anal exhaust time, time of lying in bed, the average hospital stay, complication rate than the smal incision cholecystectomy was significantly reduced ( <0.05);while the average hospitalization expenses of smal incision group was significantly less than the laparoscopic group ( 0.05).Conclusion The two kinds of operation modes can be used for benign gal bladder disease, but without the need for special equipment of smal incision cholecystectomy is more suitable in basic hospitals popularize application energetical y.